The problems with proof

Russia renewed its unwillingness to sanction Iran without concrete proof of a weapons program today. Saying "Sanctions can be discussed only when there are concrete facts showing that Tehran's nuclear activity is not exclusively peaceful," Russian foreign ministry spokesman Mikhail Kamynin told reporters."

Russia says it first in Feb 06

And again today

The problem with proof is that we have technology we don't want the rest of the world to know we have, least of all Russia or China. Or better, we think they might know already but we don't know how much they know and we don't wan't to confirm anything for them. Additionaly, we saw what happened when we did release intelligence about Iraq's weapons program... Iraq, like the rest of the world then knew what we knew and adapted accordingly by ditching everything we saw or moving it to another country (Syria, Iran?)

So do the Russians know what they are asking for? Do they know or believe they know we will never give up our intelligence sources and thus ask for proof in order to stall this process even further? Odd is the fact they Russia and China probably have something close to what we have in the ability to see and discern Iran's intentions toward Nuclear technology. In other words they probably know a lot of what we know already. So ask yourself, why if that is case do they not act, why are they stalling the progress toward sanctions? I am no conspiracy theorist mind you, but if this keeps up I may need to order a tinfoil hat of my own, cuz unless I am missing something, this is not right.