This is my Halloween pick of the day. A Tank that is invisible!! Think of the implications this could have for actual combat troops and boots on the ground operations that require stealth such as Seal teams, Rangers, etc... To bad the Brits thought of it first...
Invisible Tank
Global Warming Silly!! Or in the Immortal words of Chevy Chase as Irwin Fletcher AKA Harry Truman, "It's All Ball Bearings These Days".
Now I am the first one to say that these fires in California (My Home) are horrible and devestating to all involved, but it seems the dems have begun to tout there very existence as the latest evidence of Global Warming (Large Hall Echo).
This is a quote from Senator Harry Reid at The Hill.com
“One reason why we have the fires in California is global warming,” Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) told reporters Tuesday, stressing the need to pass the Democrats’ comprehensive energy package.
Anything to further the cause right Harry?? Well, maybe not... The Story continues,
"Moments later, when asked by a reporter if he really believed global warming caused the fires, he appeared to back away from his comments, saying there are many factors that contributed to the disaster."
It just sickens me the way these really important issues, very sad circumstances, and huge natural disasters always seem to become an addendum to the liberals latest cause Du Jur
Full Story from TheHill.com Here
Details on the various fires and there path's, homes/businesses destroyed, etc... Here
I have my own thoughts on this but Agent Bedhead sums the pertinent points up pretty well... Just so unnecessary!
See post here:
Remember Mr. Hsu? Well, apparently he is not the only Chinese felon with a sweet spot for Hillary. I don't usually stake much on what the L.A. times has to say as they are normally slanted very much to the left. But this story caught my interest and made me want to let as many people know about it as possible in the hopes it will not get buried. It looks like Hillary's campaign is now soliciting money from Chinese organized crime in poor New York neighborhoods. If this story is to be believed then she could have a big problem. I wonder if this will just bounce right off her like everything else in this election has so far?
From L.A. times: A Treasure trove Of Unlikely Donors
Malkin has a great article here
I Love This from one of the commentors at Hot Air: “The thing about donations from the Chinese is that no matter how much you get, you’ll want more an hour later.” Classic!
Here is Ann's latest installment... From her article:
"Liberals love nothing more than these constant self-righteous-athons -- as if they would ever have the courage to stand up for any cause not universally supported by everyone around them."
Full article Here
You know to hear Sean Hannity or Michael Nedved, O'Rielly or even Ann Coulter of all people talk this guy is a conservatives conservative. So you can understand why I had the sudden desire to start throwing things at the television night before last when just after I sat through this Fox News pundit lecture about how Romney was the only true conservative on the ticket on family values, marriage, abortion, etc.. I see this ad come on.
Now I was born at night, but not yesterday night... Massachusetts values? If so he definitely does not have my vote. I don't care if he is Republican, Christian, LDS, calls himself conservative, or Hindu. The one thing Massachusetts does not have straight are its values. A great example of which is our good pal Ted Kennedy, likely the most morally bankrupt politician in the senate. He has Massachusetts values too. Let's also not forget about John Kerry, a true poster child for Massachusetts values. The list would not be complete without mentioning the ultra-liberal stance the state legislature has taken on homosexual marriage. If this was not so awful it would be funny. Right now, we are a rudderless ship and none, I repeat, none of the top tier candidates for president are worth their $300.00 shoes to the Christian population of this country who actually still care not to see it go to heck in a hand basket. I mean what were the Log Cabin republicans thinking?? What was Fox thinking?? What is the RNC thinking when they prop these guys up?? Someone put a cattle prod in Fred Thompson and soon or we are going to end up with a President that has no clue how to represent our positions and at worst no desire to do so either.
I wrote a while back about the transecting, but highly opposite agendas of the Radical Islamists and the Left in America and elsewhere. This post at LGF and the accompanying article are exactly the example I need you all to see. The most memorable quote was this one:
"The Islamic Republic bans all non-Khomeinist ideologies, but two are specifically punishable by imprisonment or death: socialism and liberal democracy."
Here is my previous post: Strange Bedfellows
Well, the Nobel committee has done it again folks. Just when you thought they could not top Arafat or Carter, here comes big Al! I wonder if anyone took the time to measure the levels of methane emission before Move on.Org lit the match.
To quote the Czech Republic's President, "only Al Gore, and not a sane person, would say that mankind is ruining the planet. "
Previous Post: Company of Champions
I was happy to see that this director at least took an honest look at the horror of Abortion in its element. But I am still frustrated to find that the argument is being framed in a way that makes abortion "the" alternative choice to having a baby. Now I am a Christian, but I will not preach abstinence for all here, nor will I try to tell you what Jesus would do (even though that is clear). What I need to get across here is this. The director quotes Noam Chomsky as saying :
"There are conflicting values and taken in isolation each of these values is quite legitimate," he adds. "Choice is legitimate, preserving life is legitimate."
The plain fact is, he is correct, but the choice is not whether to abort or keep a child. The "choice" is whether to put you and your partner at risk of becoming pregnant in the first place. Excluding rape alone, this speaks loudly of our culture's inability to marry gratification with personal responsibility. For this very reason millions of Americans suffer from huge amounts of credit card debt. It is in fact too late to "choose" once you have put yourself in a position where paying your massive debt or declaring bankruptcy are the only options. No, if you are not prepared to take responsibility for the result of your actions then you have no business walking into the store to begin with. Therefore if what we are saying (and I think all would agree) is that preserving life is important as Chomsky states, or to go a bit farther as I and many others believe, to say that human life is sacred once it begins, then the debate is essentially over. Any 4th grader can tell you what usually happens when mommy and daddy do their thing... They get pregers and little johnny gets a baby sister. Really, babys don't get delivered by storks as an answer to mom's prayer (anymore). The point is that God (or nature if you prefer) created sexual relations with the purpose of procreation in mind. Why do you think it's so much fun! I can tell you that the human race would be doomed if sex were like say, plucking nose hairs, or bikini waxing or some such thing. As a society we have so totally lost our way when we can go straight to abortion as the other option while skipping over completely the fact that we should have just kept our trousers on in the first place. I am not a prude, just practical. I am totally fine with pre-emptive birth control in theory, but none of it is fool proof. So the bottom line is... If you are not prepared to face the fact that you may become pregnant, carry and deliver a baby your "choice" is simple. Do not have sex! This is not a debate about abortions or no abortions, it is a debate about responsibility or blatant irresponsibility.
Here is the article link
| Your Biblical Name Is... |
You will not live to see the end of times. |
