Jeff Emanuel's article details the frightening truth about Iran
The "I solicited Gay Sex in a bathroom and slept with pages, but I'm not Gay" Senator responds
Beckham - He's injured, he's not injured... Let me know when we all figure this out
Apparently, even a soccer ball can be offensive to Muslims
Christianity is fair game once again, but Radical Islam gets a fear pass
Ith's Tho Thilly - Marketing Mid-East tourist destinations to Gays
When I read this article today on CNN.com I just had to shake my head. Barak Obama on the 26th speaking at a Sunday church service in New Orleans invoked the Sermon on the mount. No not as an exhortation to believers to obey God's precepts, nor was it a call to be a doer of the Word. No, in fact of all the 20 + lessons Jesus taught on that mountain Obama managed to espouse not one of them, take an integral passage completely out of context, and miss the entire point of the sermon Jesus gave while he was at it. In fact he likened the famous passage in which Christ tells His listeners to build their houses on a Rock by being doers and not just hearers of The Word of God to our Governments lack of response during Hurricane Katrina.
Obama said:
"Getting ready to talk to you today, I recall what Jesus said at the end of the Sermon on the Mount," Obama said at New Orleans' First Emmanuel Baptist Church. "He said, whoever hears these sayings of mine and does them, I will liken him to a wise man who built his house on a rock."
"The rains descended, the floods came, and the winds blew and beat on that house. But it did not fall, because it was founded on the rock," he continued.
That rock, he said, was a principal of brotherhood exemplified by the church during Hurricane Katrina — but not the federal government.
"Something was wrong in America. Our foundation wasn't built on the rock."
Now, if that isn't the biggest bit of pandering to Christians I have heard since Hillary adopted her "Southern" accent, I don't know what is. First of all, if Barak were any sort of Christian at all he would know that "The Rock" is not/was not anything even remotely related to any principal of brotherhood. the Rock is Christ Himself and The Word of God. Secondly however I do agree that something was and is wrong in America, and that our foundation is less and less these days firmly planted on The Rock, the True Living Stone "that causes men to stumble". Unfortunately, Mr Obama and his paper "Faith" with comments like this are part of the problem. It is appalling to me that someone could fear God so little as to misrepresent the very words of Christ for political gain and to further their own agenda. This Liberal hand extended to Christian voters is a joke. Again as I said in the last post, I just hope America will see through it. For now I'll just have faith that nothing is hidden from God and that the truth will be laid bare in the coming months as to where these democratic candidates really stand on issues of Faith.
In the latest offering from columnist Ann Coulter, she address the Baghdad Diarist...
"Various conservatives began questioning the plausibility of the anonymous diarist's account — noting, for example, that Bradley vehicles don't "swerve," as the diarist claimed. The editor of The New Republic responded by attacking the skeptics' motives, complaining that some conservatives make "a living denying any bad news that emanates from Iraq." But when that clever retort failed to quiet rumblings from the right wing, The New Republic finally revealed the "Baghdad Diarist" to be ... John Kerry! Actually it was Pvt. Scott Thomas Beauchamp, Democratic candidate for president circa 2028. (That gives him 20 years to learn to pronounce "Genghis.")"
Too classic. View the whole article here
News Busters has an article here as well
The AP is actually going to admit there is progress being made in IRAQ since the surge?? I don't know about you, but between the Favorable New York Times Editorial page last week and the above article, I am starting to wonder which way really is up. I mean the next thing you know, Barack Obama will want to invade Pakistan... Umm... or A Democratic controlled congress will pass some new very ambiguous wire tapping legislation that doesn't require FISA approval. Crazy Huh? But those things'll never happen...
Wink, Wink, Nudge, Nudge!
There is now and has been ever since the losses of 2004 a massive effort underway by democrats to ferret out the reasons why people of faith voted and still continue to vote Republican in very large numbers. In an article out today from Time/CNN this fact becomes totally apparent from lines like these,
"Clinton has hired Burns Strider, a congressional staffer (and evangelical Baptist from Mississippi) who is assembling a faith steering group from major denominations and sends out a weekly wrap-up, Faith, Family and Values. Edwards has been organizing conference calls with progressive religious leaders and is about to embark on a 12-city poverty tour. In the past month alone, Obama's campaign has run six faith forums in New Hampshire, where local clergy and laypeople discuss religious engagement in politics. "We talk about ways people of faith have gone wrong in the past, what they have done right and where they see it going in the future," says his faith-outreach adviser, Joshua DuBois."
Full Article at time.com
So, I think it is safe to say they are serious. But with that said, it all begs the question, why did the dems lose the faith vote in the first place? Well, speaking as a person of faith and as someone who knows many devout people of faith, we vote against them not because they do not appear religious, but because they have no Christian walk to speak of, values voters vote on the basis of #1. what have you done, #2. what are you saying you'll do and #3. have you been true to what scripture says about a particular issue? No "faith steering groups", "faith-outreach-advisor's", or "faith forums" are going to replace a simple statement of your faith as it relates to the important issues like abortion, gay marriage, poverty, immigration and education that face our nation evidenced in ...wait for it... your voting record. Yes folks, it does matter to us backward religious idiots what you actually voted for in Congress or when you were Governor, Mayor, etc... It does not matter to us how religious you appear, nor does it matter how many ordained liberal hypocrites you can get to say you are a God fearing person. It also looks especially lame and desperate to me personally that they are trying so hard, and spending so much money to win something that frankly does not take money to win, but Truth, Values and an adherence to God's sovereign word.
I went and watched on the opening night, because, yes, I am a Potter addict. But before you ask, NO I do not find a conflict between my Christian faith and my love of the Potter series. But that is neither here nor there for the purposes of this post. I am here today to write a review. Honestly I was impressed for the most part with this adaptation and applaud the endeavor in the first place. However, from this movie comes the problem with using a different director for each new film. You never know what you are going to get. This time unfortunately we got less than we bargained for in a variety of areas.
#1 Realizing it would have had to be a 4 hour movie to include everything, this director excluded far too many important parts that were in the book. If you had not read any of the books and were following the movies by them selves this movie would have done nothing but confuse you.
#2 THEY CHANGED THE BLOODY STORY! Honestly guys , leave what you have to on the cutting floor, but you CAN'T change the actual story. To name just a few things, they were not at all true to the book regarding Harry's failed relationship with Cho, nor with the cause of the DA's eventual discovery. The plot point with the Centaurs was not at all there or aloud to develop nor was the reason for Harry's initial coldness toward Ron and Hermione which would have I am sure seemed extremely odd on screen to someone who had not read the book prior. Most noticeable though was the complete transformation of the end scenes from the book in the Ministry/Dept. Of Mysteries. They absolutely ripped it apart and ruined what was one of the most entertaining and gripping pieces of literature yet written by Rowling. From their entrance to the death of Sirius, to the battle climax between Voldemort and Dumbledore, in a series of scene that seemed to last around 10 minutes there were maybe 60 seconds of actual book in there. Very, very, disappointing. Don't let them push you around next time J.K., it was right the way it was written.
As for character casting I wanted to mention that I appreciated very much the way Dolores Umbridge was portrayed by Imelda Staunton. Though she should have been a tad more toady looking in the end she did a wonderful job. Also big nods to Evanna Lynch as Lunna Lovegood who though introduced entirely improperly and who's character was not given any chance to properly develop as in the book, did a superb job. Though I do seem to remember Luna wearing some sort of x-ray specs or something throughout much of the story. Nods also to Natalia Tena as Tonks and Helena Carter as Bellatrix. Nice work on Grawp and the Thestrals, Grawp looked like Alfred E. Neuman which was kind of distracting, but the effect was still good. Not so much on the Centaurs and the Sirius face in the fire effect. Both have been done much better in prior movies and should have stayed that way. Also, my misgivings about story changing aside it was very cool to see the grown up wizards fight one another. That was the bread and butter of the whole final sequence and it just ended way to fast.
All in all as I originally said, an entertaining film, but this director/screenwriter, etc... let the story down to a certain extent and did not do it complete justice by any means.
Well that's just plain gay(lame), not to be confused with gay(homosexual) or gay(extremely happy).
Come to think of it that is rather confusing... Does this mean that the dems will hold a debate that not only caters to homosexuals, but also lame idiots and extremely happy people alike? I wonder if Hillary will go the extra mile like she did down south? Maybe slick back the doo and dress up in spikes while refering to all her staffers as "My B*tch" and instructing Bill to speak with a lisp. Edwards won't have to do really anything, cept' maybe schedule a hair and nail appointment one week prior.
Happy Birthday America!! This is one of my favorite holidays here at UT's so I put together some pictures and links
What Is Independence Day??
Famous Facts:
Patriotism
Revolutionary War
Founding Fathers
Myth and Truth about Independence Day
Faith's role in our Independence
...No! You got Liberal Peanut Butter in my Great Satan Chocolate. Good thing at least one of these two dummies doesn't see what a classic combination they'd make!
From news24.com
Iran rejects Stone film request
This is the most classic line in the article but you should really read the whole thing.
"We have already seen his documentaries - even though Stone is considered a member of the opposition group in the US, it is still part of the Great Satan"
After this and hearing that Rosie O'Donnell got turned down for the Price Is Right job, I am starting to think that old prince of darkness is slippin' a bit.
From Ferris himself: "I can't quite get my mind around this whole Paris Hilton deal brothers and sisters. I mean this girl has got websites dedicated to getting her out of a 45 day jail sentence, no I did not say 45 months or years, 45 DAYS. It takes my girlfriend longer to go to the bathroom. Besides if she wanted out of the jail time in the first place I coulda' offered her the use of my fool proof snoring soundtrack or a wooden dummy to fool the gaurds while she spooned out a tunnel under downtown L.A. In conclusion let me say, Hey America, this chick's not the Walrus! I'm the freakin' Walrus ok, nuff said!
SAVE PERRIS!
Hilton's Response: "That's Hot, but it's still so not right!! Mommy! I need a frickin' Latte."
With this gem... Keeanu Reeves Is The Anti-Christ. Well at least according to the people who made this site anyway. Good for a laugh though!
20 Loopholes in the Senate Immigration Bill
From the website of Sen. Jeff Sessions (R) Alabama
* Loophole 1 – Legal Status Before Enforcement:
Amnesty benefits do not wait for the “enforcement trigger.” After filing an application and waiting 24 hours, illegal aliens will receive full “probationary benefits,” complete with the ability to legally live and work in the U.S., travel outside of the U.S. and return, and their own social security card. Astonishingly, if the trigger is never met and amnesty applications are therefore never “approved,” the probationary benefits granted to the illegal alien population never expire, and the new social security cards issued to the illegal alien population are not revoked. [See pp. 1, 290-291, & 315].
* Loophole 2 – U.S. VISIT Exit Not In Trigger:
The “enforcement trigger,” required to be met before the new temporary worker program begins, does not require that the exit portion of U.S. VISIT system – the biometric border check-in/check-out system first required by Congress in 1996 that is already well past its already postponed 2005 implementation due date – to be in place before new worker or amnesty programs begin. Without the U.S. VISIT exit portion, the U.S. has no method to ensure that workers (or their visiting families) do not overstay their visas. Our current illegal population contains 4 to 5.5 million visa overstays, therefore, we know that the U.S. VISIT exit component is key to a successful new temporary worker program. [See pp. 1-2].
* Loophole 3 – Trigger Requires No More Agents, Beds, or Fencing Than Current Law:
The “enforcement trigger” does not require the Department of Homeland Security to have detention space sufficient to end “catch and release” at the border and in the interior. Even after the adoption of amendment 1172, the trigger merely requires the addition of 4,000 detention beds, bringing DHS to a 31,500 bed capacity. This is far short of the 43,000 beds required under current law to be in place by the end of 2007, or the additional 20,000 beds required later in the bill. Additionally, the bill establishes a “catch, pay, and release” program. This policy will benefit illegal aliens from countries other than Mexico that are caught at the border, then can post a $5,000 bond, be released and never show up for deportation hearings. Annual failure to appear rates for 2005 and 2006, caused in part by lack of detention space, doubled the 2004 rate (106,000 – 110,000 compared with 54,000). Claims that the bill “expands fencing” are inaccurate. The bill only requires 370 miles of fencing to be completed, while current law already mandates that more than 700 miles be constructed [See pp. 1-2, & 10-11, and EOIR’s FY2006 Statistical Yearbook, p. H2, and The Secure Fence Act of 2004].
* Loophole 4 -- Three Additional Years Worth of Illegal Aliens Granted Status, Treated Preferentially To Legal Filers:
Aliens who broke into the country illegally a mere 5 months ago, are treated better than foreign nationals who legally applied to come to the U.S. more than two years ago. Aliens who can prove they were illegally in the U.S. on January 1, 2007, are immediately eligible to apply from inside the U.S. for amnesty benefits, while foreign nationals that filed applications to come to the U.S. after May 1, 2005 must start the application process over again from their home countries. Last year’s bill required illegal aliens to have been here before January 7, 2004 to qualify for permanent legal status. [See pp. 263, 282, & 306].
* Loophole 5 – Completion of Background Checks Not Required For Probationary Legal Status:
Legal status must be granted to illegal aliens 24 hours after they file an application, even if the aliens have not yet “passed all appropriate background checks.” (Last year’s bill gave DHS 90 days to check an alien’s background before any status was granted). No legal status should be given to any illegal alien until all appropriate background checks are complete. [See pp. 290].
* Loophole 6 – Some Child Molesters Are Still Eligible:
Some aggravated felons – those who have sexually abused a minor – are eligible for amnesty. A child molester who committed the crime before the bill is enacted is not barred from getting amnesty if their conviction document omitted the age of the victim. The bill corrects this loophole for future child molesters, but does not close the loophole for current or past convictions. [See p. 47: 30-33, & p. 48: 1-2]
* Loophole 7 – Terrorism Connections Allowed, Good Moral Character Not Required:
Illegal aliens with terrorism connections are not barred from getting amnesty. An illegal alien seeking most immigration benefits must show “good moral character.” Last year’s bill specifically barred aliens with terrorism connections from having “good moral character” and being eligible for amnesty. This year’s bill does neither. Additionally, bill drafters ignored the Administration’s request that changes be made to the asylum, cancellation of removal, and withholding of removal statutes in order to prevent aliens with terrorist connections from receiving relief. [Compare §204 in S. 2611 from the 109th Congress with missing §204 on p. 48 of S.A. 1150, & see missing subsection (5) on p. 287 of S.A. 1150].
* Loophole 8 – Gang Members Are Eligible:
Instead of ensuring that members of violent gangs such as MS 13 are deported after coming out of the shadows to apply for amnesty, the bill will allow violent gang members to get amnesty as long as they “renounce” their gang membership on their application. [See p. 289: 34-36].
* Loophole 9 – Absconders Are Eligible:
Aliens who have already had their day in court – those subject to final orders of removal, voluntary departure orders, or reinstatement of their final orders of removal – are eligible for amnesty under the bill. The same is true for aliens who have made a false claim to citizenship or engaged in document fraud. More than 636,000 alien fugitives could be covered by this loophole. [See p. 285:19-22 which waives the following inadmissibility grounds: failure to attend a removal proceeding; final orders of removal for alien smuggling; aliens unlawfully present after previous immigration violations or deportation orders; and aliens previously removed. This appears to conflict with language on p. 283:40-41. When a direct conflict appears in a statute, the statue is interpreted by the courts to the benefit of the alien.].
* Loophole 10 – Learning English Not Required For A Decade:
Illegal aliens are not required to demonstrate any proficiency in English for more than a decade after they are granted amnesty. Learning English is not required for an illegal alien to receive probationary benefits, the first 4-year Z visa, or the second 4-year Z visa. The first Z visa renewal (the second 4-year Z visa) requires only that the alien demonstrate an “attempt” to learn English by being “on a waiting list for English classes.” Passing a basic English test is required only for a second Z visa renewal (the third 4-year Z visa), and even then the alien only has to pass the test “prior to the expiration of the second extension of Z status” (12 years down the road). [See pp. 295-296].
* Loophole 11 – Earned Income Tax Credit Will Cost Taxpayers Billions In Just 10 Years:
Current illegal aliens and new guest workers will be eligible for the Earned Income Tax Credit, a refundable tax credit designed to encourage American citizens and legal permanent residents to work. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that this loophole will cost the U.S. taxpayer up to $20 billion dollars in just the first 10 years after the bill’s enactment. To be consistent with the intent of the 1996 welfare reforms – which limited new immigrants from receiving public benefits until they had been legal permanent residents for five years – the bill should withhold EITC eligibility from amnestied aliens until they become legal permanent residents. Closing this loophole will save the taxpayers billions of dollars. [See p. 293 after S.A. 1190 was adopted, p. 307, p. 315, §606. All that is required for EITC eligibility is a social security number and resident alien status. Nothing in the bill’s tax provisions limit EITC eligibility. The issuance of social security numbers to aliens as soon as they apply for amnesty will ensure they are able to qualify for the EITC.]
* Loophole 12 – Affidavits From Friends Accepted As Evidence:
Records from day-labor centers, labor unions, and “sworn declarations” from any non-relative (acquaintances, friends, coworkers, etc) are to be accepted as evidence that the illegal alien has satisfied the bill’s amnesty requirements. This low burden of proof will invite fraud and more illegal immigration – even aliens who are not yet in the U.S. will likely meet this burden of proof. DHS will not have the resources to examine whether the claims contained in the “sworn declarations” of the alien’s friends (that the alien was here prior to January 1, 2007 and is currently employed) are actually valid. [See p. 293: 13-16].
* Loophole 13 – Taxpayer Funded Legal Counsel and Arbitration:
Free legal counsel and the fees and expenses of arbitrators will be provided to aliens that have been working illegally in agriculture. The U.S. taxpayer will fund the attorneys that help these individuals fill out their amnesty applications. Additionally, if these individuals have a dispute with their employer over whether they were fired for “just cause,” DHS will “pay the fee and expenses of the arbitrator.” [See p. 339:37-41, & p. 332: 37-38.]
* Loophole 14 – In-State Tuition and Student Loans:
In-state tuition and other higher education benefits, such as Stafford Loans, will be made available to current illegal aliens that are granted initial “probationary” status, even if the same in-state tuition rates are not offered to all U.S. citizens. This would normally violate current law (8 U.S.C. §1623) which mandates that educational institutions give citizens the same postsecondary education benefits they offer to illegal aliens. [See p. 321: 8-31].
* Loophole 15 – Inadequacy of the Merit System:
The “merit system,” designed to shift the U.S. green card distribution system to attract higher skilled workers that benefit the national interest, is only a shell of what it should have been. Though the merit system begins immediately, it will not increase the percentage of high skilled immigrants coming to the United States until 2016, 8 years after enactment. Of the 247,000 green cards dedicated to the merit based system each year for the first 5 years, 100,000 green cards will be reserved for low-skilled guest workers (10,000) and for clearing the current employment based green card backlog (90,000). From 2013 to 2015, the number of merit based green cards drops to 140,000, and of that number, 100,000 green cards are still reserved each year for low-skilled guest workers (10,000) and for clearing the current employment based green card backlog (90,000). Even after 2015, when the merit system really begins (in 2016) by having 380,000 green cards annually, 10,00 green cards will be reserved specifically for low skilled workers, and points will be given for many characteristics that are not considered “high-skilled.” For example, 16 points will be given for aliens in “high demand occupations” which includes janitors, maids, food preparation workers, and groundskeepers. [See p.260: 25 – p. 261: 20, p. 262, & The Department of Labor’s list of “occupations with the largest job growth” available at www.bls.gov/emp/emptab3.htm].
* Loophole 16 – Visas For Individuals That Plan To Overstay:
The new “parent” visa contained in the bill which allows parents of citizens, and the spouses and children of new temporary workers, to visit a worker in the United States is not only a misnomer, but also an invitation for high rates of visa overstays. This new visa specifically allows the spouse and children of new temporary workers who intend to abandon their residence in a foreign country, to qualify to come to the U.S. to “visit.” The visa requires only a $1,000 bond, which will be forfeited when, not if, family members of new temporary workers decide to overstay their 30 day visit. Workers should travel to their home countries to visit their families, not the other way around. [See p. 277:1 – 33, and p. 276: 38-43].
* Loophole 17 – Chain Migration Tippled Before Being Eliminated:
Though the bill will eventually eliminate chain migration (relatives other than spouses and children of citizens and legal permanent residents), it will not have full effect until 2016. Until then, chain migration into the U.S. will actually triple, from approximately 138,000 chain migrants a year (equal to 14% of the 1 million green cards the U.S. currently distributes on an annual basis) to approximately 440,000 chain migrants a year (equal to 45% of the 1 million green cards the U.S. currently distributes on an annual basis). [See pp. 260:13, p. 270: 29 – pp. 271: 17]
* Loophole 18 – Back Taxes Not Required:
Last year’s bill required illegal aliens to prove they had paid three of their last five years of taxes to get amnesty. This year, payment of back taxes is not required for amnesty. The bill requires taxes to be paid at the time of application for a green card, but at that time, only proof of payment of Federal taxes (not state and local) is required for the years the alien worked on a Z visa, not the years the alien has already worked illegally in the United States. Though Senator McCain’s S.A. 1190, adopted by voice vote, claimed to “require undocumented immigrants receiving legal status to pay owed back taxes,” the amendment actually only required proof of payment of taxes for “any year during the period of employment required by subparagraph (D)(i).” Since the bill does not contain a subparagraph (D)(i), nor require any past years of employment as a prerequisite for amnesty, the amendment essentially only requires proof of payment of taxes for future work in the U.S., not payment of “back taxes.” [See p. 307, and p. 293 as altered by S.A. 1190, amendment p. 2: 19-20.]
* Loophole 19 – Social Security Credits Allowed For Some Illegal Work Histories:
Aliens who came to the U.S. on legal visas, but overstayed their visas and have been working in the U.S. for years, as well as illegal aliens who apply for Z visa status but do not qualify, will be able to collect social security credits for the years they worked illegally. Under the bill, if an alien was ever issued a social security account number – all work-authorized aliens who originally came on legal visas receive these – the alien will receive Social Security credits for any “quarters of coverage” the alien worked after receiving their social security account number. Because the bill requires social security account numbers to be issued “promptly” to illegal aliens as soon as they are granted “any probationary benefits based upon application [for Z status]” (these benefits are granted 24 hours after the application is filed), an illegal alien who is denied Z visa status but continues to work illegally in the U.S. will accumulate Social Security credits. [See pp. 316:8 – 16, and pp. 315: 32-39]
* Loophole 20 – Criminal Fines Not Proportional To Conduct:
The criminal fines an illegal alien is required to pay to receive amnesty are less than the bill’s criminal fines for paperwork violations committed by U.S. citizens, and can be paid by installment. Under the bill, an illegal alien must pay a $1,000 criminal fine to apply for a Z visa, and a $4,000 fine to apply for a green card. Eighty percent of those fines can be paid on an installment plan. Under the bill’s confidentiality provisions, someone who improperly handles or uses information on an alien’s amnesty application can be fined $10,000. Administration officials suggest that the bill’s “criminal fines are proportionate to the criminal conduct.” Why, then, is the fine for illegally entering, using false documents to work, and live one-tenth the fine for a paperwork violation committed by a government official? [See p. 287: 34, p. 317: 9, p. 315:6-8, & remarks made by Secretary Gutierrez on Your World with Neil Cavuto, 4:00 May 31, 2007]
I read a story today in which supposedly the Dem front runners are putting the 08 Republican nominees on notice that the "religious" voters are again up for grabs. First one thing, anyone who really follows Christ is gonna see right through a person who says they are Christian out of one side of their mouths then condones homosexuality and partial birth abortion or abortion for nearly any reason for that matter. There is a saying in our circles that goes "Love the sinner, hate the sin". Unfortunately for so called Christians like Clinton, Edwards and Obamah, it ends up more like "Love the sinner, Ignore the sin." Sin is not a word they understand properly, heck for some its not a word they even acknowledge or recognize in their own lives much less the lives of the average American. Hillary's faith seems as fake to me as her Southern Drawl.
It comes down to belief, do you believe that the Christian Bible is the inerrant word of God? Do you pick and choose which parts to believe, only apply the good parts to your own life? Is yours a faith that says, "whatever makes me feel good", or one that says, "Whatever pleases God"? I will never be prepared to judge a person's salvation as that is for Christ alone to do. All I/we can do is look at their actions, check them against their own statements and against scripture, and vote accordingly.
The Mayor and Assembly Speaker would march against there own police department to stand with Illegal Immigrants.
UnFreakin'Believable!!!
From knbc.com: "Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa and Assembly Speaker Fabian Nunez are among those expected to join immigrant-rights activists Thursday for a march and rally to denounce the actions of Los Angeles riot police at a May Day rally at MacArthur Park."
I grew up in a Los Angles County beach community, but this kind of thing makes me embarrassed to say I live here. This along with the catastrophic amounts of traffic are two great reason to consider moving a ways East. Cuz I'll let you in on a little secret folks, with this legislation that just passed today moving rapidly toward the books, it ain't gonna get any better
Pelosi's Congress is as big a bust as ours was (Shocker huh?)
Mikey Moore challenges Fred Thompson to a debate, Thompson Responds
Bruce Willis Is My Hero!
Give Rosie What She Realy Needs
More Pro-Child love from Planned Parenthood
Made entirely of Jelly Bellys.
Here is a link to the full gallery of Belly Art
| Your Biblical Name Is... |
You will not live to see the end of times. |
