Monday, September 18, 2006

Islam Rageometer and other picture postcards

Hat Tip to Wuzzadem and Malkin for this awesome link

I am going to use it because it makes my point and the point of every other sane person on earth who understands...

It is time for this nonsense to stop. When will decent people stand up once and for all and tell these ridiculous people ENOUGH!!!

The idea seems to be escaping all but a very few that you can't call yourself a peaceful religon and then when someone else challenges that statement, threaten to behead them. My brain hurts just considering the moronic iggnorance it would take to believe such a thing. Look, lets forget about why they do it because that really does not matter right now. The problem is what they do. Greater Islam cannot continue to react like a mass of spoiled, petulant children everytime somebody huuts deaw wittle feewings and then turn around and demand the respect of the world. The very idea that there is any justification or lack of exposure of these kind of acts for what they are is sureal. We are talking about educated, well rounded individuals who just let this mess continue unchecked. To my knowledge not even one country (including the US) has formaly stood up and said unequivocaly, "We wil not tolerate your stupid religous tantrums any longer". "Stop now or you won't be able to sit down for a week".

Message to Muslims: My 2 year old called, she wants her self control back...

Earlier post with the same point

Miss England Has The Answer

Also from Wuzzadem - This is freakin' hillarious: Gitmo Terro-Gator
________________________________________
Update: 3:52pm - Maybe This will wake the catholics up a bit?

Al Queda in Iraq gets its popey groove on

Religon Of Pieces burns Pope in Efigy

Friday, September 15, 2006

Friday Funnies

Two Important Bills before Congress

Hat Tip to STACLU for all the hard work in combatting those who would take away our religous freedom.

Good News: PERA goes to the House floor!

As you may or may not have heard, the Public Expression of Religion Act (PERA), which would curb the likes of the ACLU from obtaining taxpayer money in the event of adverse rulings regarding the removal of religious symbols and plaques of the Commandments, passed by voice vote out of the House Judiciary Committee and now moves to the floor for a full House vote.

Needless to say, the ACLU and Americans (Dis) United (AU) are not happy about this. You can read their press releases by clicking here and here.

TAKE ACTION

Since Congress is set to adjourn for the year at the end of this month, we urgently need you to contact House Speaker Dennis Hastert to schedule a vote on this bill. His phone number in Washington is (202) 225-2976 and his fax is (202) 225-0697. His number in Illinois is (630) 406-1114 and his fax is (630) 406-1808. Please be respectful when you call or fax and urge him to allow House Bill 2679 for a vote.

More info on Speaker Hastert can be obtained by clicking here.

The companion bill, Senate Bill 3696, in the U.S. Senate is sponsored by Kansas Senator Sam Brownback and is in the Senate Judiciary Committee. Unlike the House Judiciary Committee in which passage sailed thru without dissent, the Senate Judiciary Committee is where we must raise our voices since Chairman Sen. Arlen Specter, according to Rees Lloyd of the American Legion, is said to oppose the legislation.

Please contact Sen. Specter to allow a vote in committee and to support SB 3696. His Washington phone is (202) 224-4254 and his fax is (202) 228-1229. His Philadelphia office phone is (215) 597-7200 and the fax is (215) 597-0406.

More info on Sen. Specter can be obtained by clicking here.

Of course, we need you to call or fax your Congressmen and women to urge them to vote YES on HB 2679 and your two U.S. senators to vote YES on SB 3696. If possible, please ask the aide you reach how their lawmaker would vote and to have that lawmaker release a statement as to their position.

If you do not know who your elected officials are, click here.

If you wish, our friends at the American Legion has set up their own Action Alert page which contains information and talking points which you are free to use when you call your Congressional and senatorial leaders. There is also a section to report the results of your calls. If you do use these features, let us know how they worked out for you.

Thursday, September 14, 2006

Hezbollah Uses Jedi Mind Trick

Amnesty accused Hezbollah of possible war crimes during the 34 day war between it and Israel.The terror group's representatives responded saying,

"We do not deny that we have bombarded Israeli cities, settlements and infrastructure. But this was always a reaction," he told Al-Jazeera television. "It was a natural reaction. When a state is invaded, it must defend itself."

It was not clear Thursday what Fadlallah meant by the word "state" since by its own admission Hezbollah represents no state or specific entity to begin with. It was also not clear if the terrorist leader was including this obvious crime against humanity, or this one when he eluded to "reacting" to invasion.

Hassan Fadlallah said he learned the Jedi Mind Trick from watching Star Wars and wonders how long it will keep working on the rest of the world before someone catches on...

Wednesday, September 13, 2006

Too Bad So Sad!














Well it look like its finally the end for Stuart Smalley Radio or "Air America" for those born after 1983. Stop The ACLU and Malkin have a good round up including from Malkin every step on their way to this inevitable demise.

Air America: The end

He wasn't good enough or smart enough, and gosh darn it people just really didn't like him!

Weird Website Wednesday





















This one I don't quite know how to describe. It is a tribute to Bruce Lee of sorts but extremely strange and kinda cool actually. Its' called "I Know Where Bruce Lee Lives". If you are now or ever have been a fan of the undisputed king of martial arts then check this site out.

Tuesday, September 12, 2006

Just Oozing Class

I am always amazed at the class of those entertainers with BDS (Bush Derangement Syndrome).
I mean they are supposedly so far above all of us rednecks intelectually and morally right? It seems as though the rule is that the above is true until something disagreeable happens to them or if they just plain don't like you. As you can see below, class goes out the window:

Sean Penn calls Bush Dumb Beelzebub

Dixie Chick Maines Calls Bush a DumbF**k

Guys I want my kids to grow up to be just like you! NOT

Spoiled 9/11 Leftover: Public School Teaches 9/11 Through Saudi Eyes

Another butt kicking Conservative Blond... Check out Debbie's post on the "tolerance" in our public schools.

In case there was any doubt why our public schools are turning out dummies--junior leftists, who are dummies--here's one of the reasons.

Yesterday, while the rest of us were remember that Islamic terrorists--15 of 19 of were came from

read more | digg story

Monday, September 11, 2006

All You Need to Know About the Pentagon Attack

...you can find out from the people who saw it. Normally I would not blog something like this but given the amount of idiots out there claiming that a cruise missle or single engine drone or some other such thing hit the Pentagon, I thought it neccessary. Enjoy



A list of witness at or near to the Pentagon,

September 11th, 2001

collated from reports to be found online:



• Anon, from the Navy Annex.
As I stood there, I instinctively ducked at the extremely
loud roar and whine of a jet engine spooling up. Immediately,
the large silver cylinder of an aircraft appeared in my window,
coming over my right shoulder as I faced the Westside of the
Pentagon directly towards the heliport. The aircraft, looking
to be either a 757 or Airbus, seemed to come directly over the
annex, as if it had been following Columbia Pike - an Arlington
road leading to Pentagon. The aircraft was moving fast, at what
I could only be estimate as between 250 to 300 knots. All in all,
I probably only had the aircraft in my field of view for approximately
3 seconds.
The aircraft was at a sharp downward angle of attack, on a
direct course for the Pentagon. It was "clean", in as much
as, there were no flaps applied and no apparent landing
gear deployed
. He was slightly left wing down as he appeared
in my line of sight, as if he'd just "jinked" to avoid something.
As he crossed Route 110 he appeared to level his
wings, making a slight right wing slow adjustment
as
he impacted low on the Westside of the building to the right of
the helo, tower and fire vehicle around corridor 5.
http://www.ournetfamily.com/WarOnTerror/emails/pentagonwitness.html



• Donald "Tim" Timmerman, a 36 year old resident
of Eppington Drive, to the south of the Pentagon across
Interstate 395, is a navy pilot and a photographer.
"I was looking out the window; I live on the 16th floor,
overlooking the Pentagon, in a corner apartment, so I have
quite a panorama. And being next to National Airport, I hear
jets all the time, but this jet engine was way too loud. I looked
out to the southwest, and it came right down 395, right over
Colombia Pike, and as it went by the Sheraton Hotel, the pilot
added power to the engines. I heard it pull up a little bit
more, and then I lost it behind a building. And then it came out
and I saw it hit right in front of -- it didn't appear to crash into
the building; most of the energy was dissipated in hitting the
ground, but I saw the nose break up, I saw the wings
fly forward
, and then the conflagration engulfed everything
in flames. It was horrible.
What can you tell us about the plane itself?
It was a Boeing 757, American Airlines, no question.
You say that it was a Boeing, and you say it was a 757 or 767?
7-5-7.
757, which, of course..
American Airlines.
American Airlines, one of the new generation of jets.
Right. It was so close to me it was like looking out my window
and looking at a helicopter. It was just right there. . .
http://www.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0109/11/bn.32.html . .
A CNN on-the-sight reporter was interviewed by a fellow fromCNN :
You got a close-up look at the damage, didn't you?
Yes, I was right next to the building.
And what did you see?
I saw a big, gaping hole and I could see pieces of the plane inside.
Earlier, an eye-witness told us the plane didn't crash into the building.
Well, I don't know what it looked like from where he was, but I looked
right inside the hole and I know it crashed into the building.
http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/war/spin.htm



• Christopher Munsey, Navy Times reporter , was en route
to work.
". . I couldn’t believe what I was now seeing to my right:
A silver, twin-engine American Airlines jetliner gliding
almost noiselessly over the Navy Annex, fast, low and
straight toward the Pentagon
, just hundreds of yards away.
The plane, with red and blue markings, hurtled by and within moments
exploded in a ground-shaking “whoomp,”
http://www.navytimes.com/story.php?f=1-292925-467181.php


• John O’Keefe, 25-year-old Northern Virginia commuter,
managing editor of Influence, an American Lawyer Media
publication about lobbying was "not much more than a football
field away" on “. saw or heard it first -- this silver plane; I
immediately recognized it as an American Airlines jet,”
“It came swooping in over the highway, over my left shoulder,
straight across where my car was heading.
http://www.nylawyer.com/news/01/09/091201l.html


• Joel Sucherman, USAToday.com Multimedia
Editor, saw it all: an American Airlines jetliner
fly left to right across his field of vision as he commuted
to work Tuesday morning. It was highly unusual. The
large plane was 20 feet off the ground and a mere
50 to 75 yards from his windshield. Two seconds later
and before he could see if the landing gear was down
or any of the horror- struck faces inside, the plane slammed into the west
wall of the Pentagon 100 yards away.
"My first thought was he's not going to make it across the river to
National Airport. But whoever was flying the plane made no attempt
to change direction. It was coming in at a high rate of speed, but not
at a steep angle--almost like a heat-seeking missile was locked onto
its target and staying dead on course."
http://www.eweek.com/article/0,3658,s%253D704%2526a%253D15161,00.asp
"it came screaming across the highway, route 110"
Was it a commercial jet? Do you know how many engines?
"I did not see the engines, I saw the body and the tail; it was
a silver jet with the markings along the windows that spoke
to me as an American Airlines jet, it was not a commercial,
excuse me, a business jet, it was not a lear jet, it was a bigger plane than that.".


• Omar Campo, a Salvadorean, was cutting the grass on
the other side of the road when the plane flew over his head.
"It was a passenger plane. I think an American Airways plane,
" Mr Campo said. "I was cutting the grass and it came in screaming
over my head.


A woman driver wanting to exit from Interstate 395 saw
"a commercial plane that came in and was coming too fast
and too low amnd the next thing we saw was it go down below
the side of the road and we just saw the fire.."
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/day.video.09.html



Vaughn face Brig. Gen. Clyde A. Vaughn, deputy director of
military support to civil authorities.
was returning to the Pentagon Sept. 11
returned urgently from a meeting, north
along Interstate 395 . While exiting the ramp
to the Pentagon he"was scanning the air.
There wasn't anything in the air, except for one airplane,
and it looked like it was loitering over Georgetown, in a
high, left-hand bank," he said. "That may have been the plane.
I have never seen one on that (flight) pattern."
http://www.cnn.com/2001/US/09/13/pentagon.terrorism
He pulled his car over and sprinted toward the gaping, flaming hole
“It took me four to five minutes to get there,”
http://www.govexec.com/dailyfed/0901/091401kp1.htm
http://www.dtic.mil/armylink/news/Sep2001/a20010919fireheroes.html



Mark Bright, was the first security officer to arrive at the scene
, having actually seen the plane hit the building while manning the
guard booth at the Mall Entrance.
"I saw the plane at the Navy Annex area,"
"I knew it was going to strike the building because it was very,
very low -- at the height of the street lights. It knocked a couple down."
He said he heard the plane "power-up" just before it struck the Pentagon.
http://www.dcmilitary.com/marines/hendersonhall/6_39/local_news/10797-1.html


Alan Wallace, a 55 year old Fort Myer firefighter was
standing with fellow firefighter Mark Skipper, about 200 feet
away from the catastrophe, standing outside their fire station.
They bith suffered first and second degree burns.
http://www.msnbc.com/news/635293.asp
Wallace described a white airplane with orange and blue trim,
heading almost straight at them. "When I felt the fire, I hit the ground,"
http://detnews.com/2001/nation/0109/11/nation-291261.htm
"I just happened to look up and see the plane. It was about 200
yards away, and was coming in low and fast. I told Mark that we
needed to get the hell out of there."
Dennis Young, a third fireman at the scene, but inside the fire
house, had been one of the first to respond when a Canadian C-130
crashed near Fairbanks, Alaska in 1989.
"I knew from past experience that it was a plane crash."
www.iaff.org/across/news/archives/102401local.html



At a media briefing, Pentagon spokeswoman Torie Clark
told the story of Capt. Lincoln Liebner, who was outside
the Pentagon when the blast took place. He rushed into
the building to help. His hands were burned, and after
he was taken away to a hospital for treatment, he returned
later in the day to do more.


• Captain Lincoln Liebner, was parking his car at the
moment of attack: 'I saw this large American Airlines
passenger jet coming in fast and low,' said Army Captain
Lincoln Liebner. 'We got one guy out of the fire truck cab,'
he said, adding he could hear people crying inside the wreckage.
http://straitstimes.asia1.com.sg/mnt/html/webspecial/WTC/wtcnews15.html
"I saw this large American Airlines passenger jet coming in fast and low,"
"My first thought was I've never seen one that high. Before
it hit I realised what was happening, Captain Liebner says
the aircraft struck a helicopter on the helipad, setting
fire to a fire truck.
We got one guy out of the cab,"
he said, adding he could hear people crying inside the wreckage.
Captain Liebner, who had cuts on his hands from the debris, says
he has been parking his car in the car park when the crash occurred.""
http://abc.net.au/news/2001/09/item20010911230953_1.htm
French version:
http://www.cyberpresse.ca/reseau/monde/0109/mon_101090013337.html



• Alfred S. Regnery, president and publisher of Regnery Publishing, Inc., a sister
company of Human Events saw
". . a jetliner, apparently at full throttle and not more than a couple
of hundred yards above the ground, screamed overhead."
http://www.humanevents.org/articles/09-17-01/regnery.html


• Mike Walter, 46, USA Today reporter, said
"I was sitting in the northbound on 27 and the traffic
was, you know, typical rush-hour -- it had ground to
a standstill. I looked out my window and I saw this plane,
this jet, an American Airlines jet, coming. And I thought,
'This doesn't add up, it's really low.'
And I saw it. I mean it was like a cruise missile with
wings. It went right there and slammed right into the Pentagon."
http://www.cnn.com/2001/US/09/11/attack.in.their.words


Sergeant Maurice L. Bease had worked around Marine
aviation long enough to know what a fly-by was, and it
sounded like one as he stood outside his office near the
Pentagon on Sept. 11. Turning around expecting to see
a fighter jet fly over, he saw only a split-second glimpse
of a white commercial airliner streaking low toward
the building, and him! He did not even have time to duck
before it plowed into the side of the Pentagon around the
corner and about 200 yards from where he stood.
Report by Maj Fred H. Allison, USMCR (Ret):
http://www.mca-marines.org/Leatherneck/nov01pentagonarch.htm


• Afework Hagos, 26, of Arlington, is a computer
programmer, a consultant for Nextel. On his way to
work he was stuck in a traffic jam on Columbia Pike,
near the Pentagon when the plane flew over.
"There was a huge screaming noise and I got out of
the car as the plane came over. Everybody was running
away in different directions. It was tilting its wings up
and down like it was trying to balance
. It hit some
lampposts on the way in."
http://www.guardian.co.uk/wtccrash/story/0,1300,550486,00.html


. He saw a plane flying very low and close to nearby
buildings. "I thought something was coming down on me.
I know this plane is going to crash. I've never seen a plane
like this so low."
He said he looked at it and saw American Airline
insignia
and when it made impact with the Pentagon
initially he saw smoke, then flames.
http://a188.g.akamaitech.net/f/188/920/5m/www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/metro/daily/sep01/attack.html


Dave Winslow, AP Radio Reporter lives across the street.
He saw."the tail of a large airliner ."
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Print/0,3858,4254882,00.html



Eugenio Hernandez, an AP video journalist, was
driving by the Pentagon and saw the plane crashing. He
borrowed a tourist's video camera began shooting.
http://www.apbroadcast.com/AP+Broadcast/about+us/miscellaneous/in+the+news.htm


Christine Peterson, ’73 found herself in the thick
of last month’s terrorist tragedy, and submitted this report:
". . I was at a complete stop on the road in front of the helipad at the
Pentagon; what I had thought would be a shortcut was as slow as the other
routes I had taken that morning. I looked idly out my window to the left --
and saw a plane flying so low I said, “holy cow, that plane is going to hit
my car” (not my actual words). The car shook as the plane flew over. It
was so close that I could read the numbers under the wing."
http://www.naualumni.com/News/News.cfm?ID=613&c=4


Fred Gaskins, was driving to his job as a national editor at
USA TODAY near the Pentagon when the plane passed about
150 feet overhead. "(The plane) was flying fast and low and
the Pentagon was the obvious target, It was flying very
smoothly and calmly
, without any hint that anything was wrong."
• Aydan Kizildrgli, an English language student who is a native
of Turkey, saw the jetliner bank slightly.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2001/09/11/attack-usat.htm


• Kirk Milburn, a construction supervisor for Atlantis Co.
was on the Arlington National Cemetery exit of Interstate 395.
"I was right underneath the plane. I heard a plane. I saw it.
I saw debris flying. I guess it was hitting light poles. It
was like a WHOOOSH whoosh, then there was fire and smoke,
then I heard a second explosion."
Steve Patterson, is a graphics artist who works at home.in
a 14th-floor apartment in Pentagon City. While watching events
unfold on TV he saw a silver commuter jet fly past his window
about 150 yards away, approaching from the west about 20 feet
off the ground
, He said it appeared to him that a commuter
jet which appeared to hold about eight to 12 people
,
headed straight for the Pentagon but was flying as if coming in
for a landing on a nonexistent runway.
The plane, which sounded like the high-pitched squeal
of a fighter jet
, flew over Arlington cemetary so low that he
thought it was going to land on I-395. "at a frightening rate .‚.‚.
just slicing into that building." He saw bright orange flames shoot
out the back of the building.
John Damoose, a Travis City, Mich. native who was in a
meeting said "everybody got nervous. .‚.‚. We didn't know
whether to stay inside or go outside. The thing with terrorist
attacks is that you don't know what is the next thing that will happen."
He said the worst part was leaving the Pentagon and walking
along Fort Meyer Drive, a bike trail, "you could see pieces of the plane."
http://a188.g.akamaitech.net/f/188/920/5m/www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/metro/daily/sep01/attack.html



Mc Graw head Father Stephen McGraw was driving to a
graveside service at Arlington national Cemetery. McGraw
estimates that the plane passed about 20 feet over his car,
as he waited on the northbound side of Washington Boulevard.
"I was in the left hand lane with my windows closed. I did not
hear anything at all until the plane was just right above our cars."
"The plane clipped the top of a light pole just before it got to us,
injuring a taxi driver, whose taxi was just a few feet away from my car.
http://www.dcmilitary.com/army/pentagram/6_39/local_news/10772-1.html
http://www.mdw.army.mil/news/Pentagon_crash_eyewitness_comforted_victims.html


Clevelnd face Allen Cleveland of Woodbridge Virginia looked out from
a Metro train going to National Airport, to see a jet heading
down toward the Pentagon. "I thought, 'There's no landing strip
on that side of the subway tracks,' " Before he could process that
thought, he saw "a huge mushroom cloud. A lady staThe lady next to me
was in absolute hysterics." " . . a silver pasenger jet, mid sized"
http://mfile.akamai.com/920/rm/thepost.download.akamai.com/920/nation/091101-5s.ram
http://www.newsbytes.com/news/01/170005.html



Meseidy Rodriguez confirms "it was a mid size plane".


Oscar Martinez ``.. saw a big jet flying close to the building coming
at full speed. There was a big noise when it hit the building,'' said , who
witnessed the attack.
http://www.firehouse.com/terrorist/11_APdc.html


Ron Turner, the Navy’s deputy chief information officer,
was standing at a funeral at Arlington National Cemetery:
“There was a huge fireball, followed by the [usual] black
cloud of a fuel burn
.” “It reminded me of being back in
Vietnam, watching Tan Son Nhut Air Base burn.”
http://www.govexec.com/dailyfed/0901/091301j3.htm


ARFF fire Crews reported fires on every floor of the "D" and
"E" rings. The aircraft had penetrated all the way to the "C" ring.
"The only way you could tell that an aircraft was inside was that
we saw pieces of the nose gear.
http://www.nfpa.org/NFPAJournal/OnlineExclusive/Exclusive_11_01_01/exclusive_11.01.01.asp


Ken Ford, a State Department employee, watched from the
15th floor of the State Department Annex,just across the Potomac
River from the Pentagon. We were watching the airport through
binoculars, Ford said, referring to Reagan National Airport, a short
distance away.The plane was a two-engine turbo prop that
flew up the river from National
. Then it turned back toward
the Pentagon.We thought it had been waved off and then it hit the building.
Daniel and Cynthia McAdams said they were sitting in their kitchen
drinking coffee in their third-floor condominium in Arlington,Va.,just two
miles from the Pentagon when they heard a plane fly directly over head
around 9:45 a.m. It was unusually loud and low.
http://www.delawareonline.com/newsjournal/local/2001/09/pdf/09112001EXTRA2.pdf
http://www.ireland.com/newspaper/world/2001/0912/wor5.htm


Steve Riskus, steveriskus@aol.com wrote:
I took these pictures less then 1 minutes after I watched
the american airlines 757 airplane crash into the pentagon on
september 11 2001. I left shortly after the picture were taken
in fear of further attacks. Feel free to contact me anytime if you
have questions about my pictures. I did acctually see the plane impact the building.
http://www.criticalthrash.com/terror/crashthumbnails.html


Mickey Bell, an electrical contractor's foreman was working to
renovate the second and third floors. Outside, and less than 100
feet from the initial impact of the plane, he was very nearly
struck by one of the wings as they sped by him. He had just left
the project trailer (that exploded) when he heard a loud noise.
The next thing he recalled was picking himself off the floor, where
he had been thrown by the blast.
He got into his truck, parked in the trailer compound, and sped
away. Plastic and rivets from an airplane were later found
imbedded in its sheet metal
http://www.necanet.org/whats_new/report.cfm?ID=1003:
http://www.ecmag.com/industrynews/index.cfm?fuseaction=view&art_id=1115
"We went out to look at his truck and the truckbed was filled with
all kinds of debris that must have come from the blast. He's one
really lucky guy,"


Wayne T. Day, President of ' Kirlin', Rockville MD, says
"We had one guy who was standing, looking out the window
and saw the plane when it was coming in. He was in front of one
of the blast- resistant windows,"
http://www.designbuildmag.com/oct2001/pentagon1001.asp


Steve Snaman, manager of the datacom division for Walker Seals,
watched from Fort McNair (across the river) as the jetliner came
in low at full throttle, banked left and smashed into the wall of the Pentagon.
http://www.ecmag.com/industrynews/index.cfm?fuseaction=view&art_id=1117





Compiled impartially,
( with compliments especially to Steve Riskus )
by UK resident Ron Harvey,

last updated March 2002,

Remember This!!

NOT For The Squemish... Six Meat Buffet has the startling video shot by an amature of people jumping out of windows in Tower 1 after the first plane hit.

Religon Of Peace 9/11 Edition

The 2996 Project - Larry I. Beck

Hat Tip Six Meat Buffet

As part of the 2996 Project, we take the occasion of the fifth anniversary of the worst terrorist attack in our nation's history to remember Larry I. Beck, mailroom clerk at Cantor Fitzgerald, killed on 9/11 at the World Trade Center. Larry was from Baldwin, New York, and was 38 years old when his life was cut short by Saudi missionaries...

read more | digg story

9/11 pledge: "I will not submit"

Michelle Malkin's superb anniversary message to jihadists and Cindy Sheehan's favorite Arabic t-shirt. And, a personal thank you to Michelle, Spencer and Andy for their responses to Ralph Peters rant.

read more | digg story

9/11 Rememberence

...is all I will be blogging today. Plus a few other 9/11 related tidbits. Since every other blog out there has what I am certain are a ton of pictures of the actual attacks I will spare you more. Other than to remind you that our attackers drove three planes into American targets and are trying even as I write these words to come up with a plot that will again succeed the way 2001 did. So first lets look at the spirit of America and remember the victims:
















We were attacked by people who hate us, who hate our way of life, our religon's, our liberty. We find ourselves now at a most unique point in the history of this country where men and women will look back on it and we will be judged. Will we stand in the face of death and evil or will we shrink back in fear and say, "its ok, as long as they don't hurt us", until once again inevitably they do. Fortunately, we have a President who, no matter what his detractors may say about him is commited to standing and fighting. Unlike other world leaders who talk like they want to stop the terrorists then do nothing, our's is singularly committed to fight for as long as it take to get the job done:

We will not waver and we will not shrink back. The most chilling thing is however, that there are those who just ... don't ... get it

So we remember somberly the five years that have passed between then and now and the sacrifices made in the name of our God and country both here and abroad. We are a unique nation among the others of the world, we are "the" example for other countries who aspire to be free republics. What must they think when they look at us and see things like this and this.

We have a responsibility to be accountable for the great freedoms we have here and to not let slip the sacrifice in blood that thousands of great heroic men and women have made so that you and I can live, work and raise families here in America.

I pray for comfort in the lives of the familes who lost loved ones today, for the brave military persons who have lost their lives in the line of fire and for any who would put their job,life, family on the line for something greater than themselves!

I salute You!!!

Friday, September 08, 2006

Pitt-Jolie one less riduculous hyphenated name...

To worry about for the time being. Brad Pitt said today that he and fellow gazillionaire sex symbol Angelina Jolie will not be getting married until the rest of the country (USA) can decide for themselves who they want to marry and do so legally. Implying that he and Jolie are both against restricting marriage to a man and a woman.

"Angie and I will consider tying the knot when everyone else in the country who wants to be married is legally able," the 42-year-old actor reveals in Esquire magazine's October issue, on newsstands Sept. 19.

Pu-lease, Just another witty bit (or steaming pile) of moonbattery from our good altruistic friends in Hollywood. According to publisists, Pitt's next move will be to hold his breath and stomp his feet til' he turns blue when and if partial birth abortion ever gets banned. Jolie's people say that she is content just to kick Uncle Sam's ankles and swear a lot.

Friday Funnies

Thursday, September 07, 2006

Non-Story is now a Story















The recent flap by Democrats over the so called "inaccuracies" in the new Docu-drama "The Path to 9/11" has done more to feed the controversy over Clinton administration officials actions during the time period leading up to the terror attacks than the actual footage in the series itself would have. It is historically true that innocent people have no need to explain themselves. Though, as of now after their fervent and sometimes, frankly threatening efforts to pressure ABC into changing or editing certain scenes in the upcoming series, the DNC and the Clinton Administration have roused my suspicion (and likely many others) even more as to their actions than if they had just kept quite and accepted their portion of the responsibility for the massive failures at both the Executive and DOD levels that led to the attacks in the first place.

Please take the time to read the letter that prominent Dem senators wrote to ABC Execs. essentialy threatening them with who knows what if the scenes were not deleted or altered. Also, see my earlier post with the first links to yesterdays and todays breaking news on the matter. 9/11's disasterous implications fall equally on both Republicans and Democrats, but I have yet to see or here about one Republican or Bush Admin official denying or refuting any portion of the events depicted in this movie. Hmmmmm?

Dem letter to ABC

ABC Series canned by Dems

________________________

Other Bloggers Chime In:

Little Green Footballs

Malkin's Pissed

Ace Of Spades

Sister Toldjah

News Busters
_______________________
Update: 09/08/06 - Well you know when Drudge has 6 links and the headlines about a story, it is officially a story. So my point made, Dems are still today mounting a massive smear campaign against this film and asking that it be severly edited our withdrawn completely from ABC's schedule. Well, if your Uncle Tim was not sure the Dems had something to lose by the truth being told, I am now. I am hoping that Iger gives Bill and his Lackeys the Big Bubba Bird and not only airs it, but airs it in its entirety!

The blogs are all on fire for this today:

Seixon - Now They Get Tough
Malkin - Viewer Discretion Is Advised
Allah - Miserable Failure

A Must Read...NOT

Cindy Sheehan's book hits the shelves 9/19 and is sure to be an instant favorite among liberals, psychotics, the emotionaly disturbed, bi-polar wet nurses and Hugo Chavez. The book is called "Peace Mom" but we decided to have a bit of fun with it... Click on the Pic to take a look at our offering and be sure to leave a comment if you have one to add as well...

MSM "Never Mind!"

This is a classic SNL reference with total significance... Read on!

I watched entirely too much television as a child. I was a big fan of Saturday Night Live and loved the Emily Litella character. For those unfamiliar with Litella, she was played by Gilda Radner and was a little old lady who did commentary on the SNL Weekend Update segment.

read more | digg story

Wednesday, September 06, 2006

Border Security=Immigrant Legislation
















Bill Frist said today that in his view "no comprehensive immigration reform could be passed" in the three weeks congress has left before they begin campaigning for the Nov. Mid-terms. He outlined a sharp division that arose between the Senate who put forward a more all inclusive legislative package and the House which favored a comprehensive bill only after the issue of Border Security has been dealt with first.

Political Opinion Alert: Bill Frist and representatives like Tom Tancredo have it right. There is no immigration reform without border enforcement first. Honestly no matter what side of the "Illegal" issue you come down on, there is no argument about whether or not we should secure our borders. Neither is there any point in giving 12,000,000 non-citizens what amounts to almost complete amnesty before the source of the problem gets handled. In reality there is nothing comprehensive about the senate bill since it does very little if anything at all to address the massive exodus of mexican citizens over our South Western borders. A tough border security bill first to stop the bleeding. Then by all means, treat those already in this country fairly according to our laws and values as americans. Our governments failure to deal with this a decade ago has resulted in this problem being what it is today.

ABC Mini-Series canned by Dems

















Democrats this week spoke out in oposition to the airing of a new 9/11 docu-drama analyzing the trail of events that lead to the terrorist attacks that killed nearly 3000 Americans in 2001. Their biggest complaint was that there were many inaccuracies and misrepresentations of the events that took place during the Clintoon Presidency. Of course when they had pointed out to them that the series was just as critical of the Bush Administration as of the Clintoon's, a spokesman for the former president responded,

"The difference is, the stuff they show the Bush administration doing actually happened."

Gosh, now who would have figured that??
____________________________________
Update: 9/7/06 - Clinton Unhinged over Mini-Series Allegations

Bubba Goes Ballistic On ABC

Clinton admin. Assail Docu-Drama
____________________________________
Update: ABC Partially Caves In To Dem Pressure To Change Certain Scenes




Weird Website Wednesday


Well this one is interesting to say the least. It is called Streetmattress.com and I will let you decipher the content yourself.

Thursday, August 31, 2006

Fool Me Thrice...

Its time to start firing people! The latest incident of passive Bush hating that went largerly under reported is the 3rd by the same broadcasting company in 2 years. CNN is building an infamous reputation for little "gliches" during Bush Admnistration Officials speeches airing live on there network.

The first you will remember was when they began airng President Bush's speech too early and the viewers saw him practicing instead of his actual speech. The link is below...

CNN Airs Bush Speech Too Early

The next was the mysterious and large X over Dick Cheny's face during a speech he gave about Iraq War critics.

Black X Over Cheney's Face


The third and most recent being the leaving on of an anchors Mic during a live Bush speech

CNN Anchors Mic Left On During Bush Speech


And last but certainly not least there was this post election photo of George and Laura that ended up with an extremely ugly caption on it post Nov. 04

CNN Puts Bias Caption On George and Laura Picture

One time I saw probably a mistake, twice, I say could have been on purpose, but these are professionals, three times or four times, somebody's arse needs to be fired. As an aside I wonder if these three incidents have any commonality in personel. Like the same technicians being on duty while they happened? Hmmm, I wonder? Even if these were all honest mistakes, what does that say about the quality of employees working at CNN? I wonder how many little gliches we could find during the Clintoon's 8 years in office? My guess would be none.

That is just CNN though. There have also been a few more from other news angencies. Malkin did a piece on this a while back. The link is below

Demonizing Condi

Miss England Has the Answer!













"Stop Stereotyping Muslims". Hammasa Kohistani is the first Muslim woman to be crowned Miss England and will represent England in the Miss World Pagent. Kohistani sees this as a"sugar coating" for Muslims who feel otherwise alienated. The Miss World and Miss Universe Pagents have sparked outrage in the Muslim community in past years over the scant clothing and non-adherance to muslim traditions concering womens dress. Ms. Kohistani does not seem to be worried about this however and sights Muslim stereotyping as a major concern in her community and in Britain as a whole.

She said: "The attitude towards Muslims has got worse over the year. Also the Muslims' attitude to British people has got worse."

"Even moderate Muslims are turning to terrorism to prove themselves. They think they might as well support it because they are stereotyped anyway. It will take a long time for communities to start mixing in more."

Miss England also went on to forward the idea that when the British Government asked Muslim leaders to handle the problem (of terrorism) better within their own communities, they were actually causing more terrorism.

Miss Kohistani said: "Tony Blair addressed Muslims in particular, telling them that they need to sort out the problem within. That was a huge stereotype of the Islamic community. Even the more moderate Muslims have been stereotyped negatively and feel they have to take actions to prove themselves."

By actions, she means terrorist violence, not actions that would prove the PM Blair wrong. Miss Kohistani is only one woman and only a model at that. But if her feelings are correct and I dare say they are, it illustrates a serious problem within the British and probably the world muslim community at large. Islamic Terrorism is a real issue, not something that white, western governments made up to oppress Arab people. There is deep seeded mistrust among westerners toward Muslims and their religion and who can blame them? Nearly 100% of Terrorists are Muslims and they act from a religous piety that justifies the killing of innocents in the name of Islam. Miss Kohistani is correct when she says it will take a long time. It will take a long time and a lot of effort on the part of good, peaceful moderate muslims to show not only Britain that they are not all bad people and that Islam is not a religon of death and mayhem, but the entire world. Turning to violence and terror to "prove themsleves", will only further alienate them and prove the point of those who would keep those divisions alive. It is a cop-out to imply that the West's fear of Muslims and their religon is a justification for more violence, whether based on pride or just sheer stupidity. I echo PM Blair in pleading with the Muslim community to stand up and fight the extremist fringes of their religon, denounce their actions publicly and often and begin on a road to establishing themsleves as peaceful people again. As I have heard military people say on more than one occasion, "You can't put the sh*t back in the goose, you just have to clean up the mess and move on". Truer words were never spoken!
___________________________________________
UPDATE: 1:30pm PST

U.S. Muslims Warn of Threat From Within - Makes my original point and thank God Muslim leaders somewhere are getting it finally!

Wednesday, August 30, 2006

Weird Website Wednesday






Good mid-week to you all! This weeks entry is dear to me as I just love this kind of stuff. So click away, then sit back and enjoy, "The Webpage of Useless Information"

Tuesday, August 29, 2006

Spike Lee Is An Idiot











I saw this posted on Newsbusters today. On Un-Real Time with Bill(I'm a lying sac of monkey sh*t)Mahr, Spike Lee again raised the possibility that the Levee in New Orleans was destroyed by the federal government on purpose. When confronted with the fact that there is absolutely no evidence to support his claim Lee avoided the issue with ridiculous statements like the below:

"Let me ask you a question: Do you think that election in 2000 was fair? You don't think that was rigged." “If they can rig an election, they can do anything!”

AND

“Because nobody saw, because nobody saw means, can it happen? Let me ask you a question: With the history of this country, you ever heard of 'Tuskegee experiment’? Answer! Answer!”

AND

“Presidents have been assassinated. So why is that so far-fetched?”

Honestly I am surprised he didn't bring up the Bush planned 9/11 theory too for good measure. I think Spike ought to lay off that white mans crack he's been smokin'.

When he had previously been informed that time travel was not possible either Lee retorted, "They can make a cartoon about a talking, yellow Sea Sponge. So why is it so far fetched."

And when confronted with the idea that in no way was Michael Jackson's nose real, Lee angrily replied, "Let me ask you a question, do you think Michael Moore has an eating disorder? You don't think Michael Moore has an eating disorder?"

The world may never know Spike, the world... may never know!

The whole transcript is here, Tucker Carlson made Lee look like an idiot in this piece. Carlson's statement is below to which Lee had no answer at all...

Carlson: “I was in New Orleans right after the hurricane in the ninth ward. And while I didn't hear anybody say the levee was blown up by the federal government, I did interview a bunch of people who were stuck there who said they believed this was part of the conspiracy to rid New Orleans of black people. They honestly believed that. I didn’t argue with them, I just listened to what they said and I felt bad for them. So as you sit here -- who is someone who is rich and has option -- and are watched by people who are poor and have no options, it seems to me it's your responsibility, your obligation to tell them the truth and you know the truth, which is the federal government did not blow up the levees so don’t feed the paranoia and the crazies.”

Spike Lee's arguments and his claims were juvenille and exceedingly stupid and he should be ashamed.

Monday, August 28, 2006

Lerch Revives the UUUUUAAAAGGHHHH argument




















...as the reason he lost the 2004 election. John Kerry is back and he's mad as heck! He conceded the election and bowed out gracefully so as not to appear a complete loser like his globally warm compatriot Al Gore. But now right on cue for the November mid-terms the man who voted for himself before 2/3 of the country voted against him brings you "Ohio Republicans cheated me out of the Presidency".

So let's review, if you are a democrat your choices for President in 2008 are:

Hillary Clinton

John Kerry

Al Gore

and maybe a few others who have absolutely no chance. I almost feel sorry for you. I mean it would be one thing if we were talking about Al Franken or Jeneane Giraffalo but these are your candidates for president, the three stooges! The 3 horsemen of the moral apocalypse. Oh well, "no soup for you" then!!

Friday, August 25, 2006

The Border Patrol Inquisition

This is absolutely outrageous and someone within our government should make it right. A definite must read for anyone who cares about border security in America...

"BE A BORDER Patrol agent: Do your job, go to prison. That's how the job must look to agents Ignacio Ramos and Jose Alonso Compean."

read more | digg story

What Part Of The War On Terrorism Do They Support?

Ann Coulter hits it on the nose again. You can say what you want about her, but the fact is she tells it like it is and pulls no politically correct punches.

"This year's Democratic plan for the future is another inane sound bite designed to trick American voters into trusting them with national security...

read more | digg story

Friday Funnies

More Proof that we are being Jerked Around by Russia


I have posted about it before and today once again the Russian's have proved that contrary to their prior statments condeming Iran's Nuclear programs, they actually support them and have a large financial interest in seeing them succeed. The below article entitled,

Russia Rejects Sanctions Against Iran


illustrates the problem that the US and Britan, along with other countries who believe Iran is a threat, have in stopping its' arms progams by peaceful means. The following is from Sergei Ivanov who undoubtedly speaks for Putin as well,

"I believe that the question is not so serious at the moment for the U.N. Security Council or the group of six to consider any introduction of sanctions. Russia stands for further political and diplomatic efforts to settle the issue."

So now by saying this the Russians are essentialy voiding their agreement to impose sanctions in the event that Iran misses the Aug 31st deadline. My guess is that China will soon follow suit.
I have linked below to some older news stories that have the russians saying everything from "Iran should not have Nuclear weapons", to the above which implies at the very least a niave attitude and at worst a total complicity in forwarding Iran's aspirations for Nuclear weapons.

"Our Iranian Partners Must Give Up Developement of Nuclear Cycle Technology" - 08/05

"Russia Convinced that Iran is NOT Trying to Develope Nuclear Arms" - 02/05

"Putin Offers Iranian President Continued Nuclear Cooperation" - 06/05

"Putin Urges Iran to Accept EU Proposal to halt Enrichment" - 04/06

"Putin favors Iran abandoning Nuclear Reseach" - 06/06


"Putin Tells Iran It Has A Right to Develop Nukes If It Does Not Threaten Other Nations" - 06/06

"Putin Defends Iran Nuke Program" - 02/06

"Putin Urges Iran To Accept Proposals to Stop Enrichment" - 07/06

I do not know what you all think, but in your Uncle Tim's opinion Vlad does a better version of the old Potomic two step than even the trickiest of tricky dicks

For more on Uncle Tim's posting on Iran see

"This is Scary"

"Iraq Should Have Been Second"

"Bishop to Knight 3"

"Six Power Package of Perks or Penalties"


Target: Mt. Soledad Memorial - ACLU keeps the wrecking ball on call

The ACLU today filed a federal lawsuit in its latest attempt to drive all reference to faith from the public square. In what is a smart PR move on the ACLU's part, they've brought a group called the Jewish War Veterans on as a plaintiff along with local residents. So what was once a case that pitted a lone rabid atheist gadfly against

read more | digg story

Thursday, August 24, 2006

Morning After What...Exactly?





















Feds ease restrictions on morning after pill "Plan B"

You just have got to love the federal government. If it makes a buck or saves a buck, they be right behind it nearly everytime. Personally I agree with both sides of the argument. The left says it will significantly reduce the amount of unwanted prenancies and the right says it will increase promiscuity. Both are good points, however the FDA saying it is safe does not comfort me in any way...Can anyone say VIOXX? Additionally, there is a decent chance that many people who were afraid to have sex before for fear of becoming pregnant, will now sans consequences, become far more promiscuous than before. Meaning a greater number of people will be having unprotected sex. So lets do the math. If the above is true and it is also true that Plan B is only 89% effective, then it would seem to me that there is a chance that unwanted pregnancy may rise just on sheer volume alone. Not to mention the "unprotected part, cuz you know nobody likes to wear protection if they don't have to. That could raise the number of STD's as well.

At Uncle Tim's we take issue with the idea that there should be an "out" that inconsequncial to begin with. Sex is not something to be taken lightly. What this does is give every irresponsible man or woman with a libido a license to boff anyone they please without having any reason to think first. Sex belongs between a man and a woman who love one another, and only in the context of a life long relationship. I know many of you will disagree with me, but I also know that many of you have had bad experinces from bringing sex into a relationship before it belongs there. Or that many of you have at least experienced guilt or just felt not ok after giving yourself to someone who is not suppose to have you. That is because when God made us man and woman and when he said "the two shall become one flesh", he meant it. Sex and love making are meant to be a physical affirmation of that statement between two people who plan to spend their lives together. Not that it has to be any more or less solemn or any less wild and fun. But it does come with responsibility. Responsibility to yourself, to your own body, to the person with whom you plan to do it. This pill is not the problem, the need for this pill at all is the problem. Our insistence on letting it be as easy to buy as a stick of gum only further lets slip the morality of America.

Compiled MSM Fakery

Hat Tip to Six Meat for the heads up. This is an awesome compilation of all the fake news the MSM has been busted on these last months. Hope you enjoy, and don't forget to vote for it on you tube. Vote Here

Weird Website Wednesday (on Thursday)

Sorry for the lack of posting, I am dealing with some family matters that have my mind otherwise occupied at the moment. Here is you Wed. post, hope you enjoy!

This one is called "Stinky Meat"

Tuesday, August 22, 2006

Why Iraq should have been second


















Iran Says Ready for Serious Talks

If you have been paying any attention at all to the Nuclear stand-off with Iran you have probably heard President Bush say more than once that "Iran is not Iraq" or some such thing. Mostly in response to people who wonder why the same pre-emptive stance of the Bush doctrine has not been applied in Iran as well as Iraq. Well, that may be the administration's line but I have a different theory. It has to do with many other factors including that we are already in Iraq and have over 100,000 boots on the ground a mere stones throw away from Iran's considerable arsenal. Now I am sure that none of you would debate with me that Iran is and was at the time we invaded Iraq a greater threat both at home and in the greater middle east than Saddam Hussein. But for those of you who are not sure let me explain.

#1. The terror group Hezbollah makes its home in Iran and is financed solely by Iran according to all reliable intelligence. Hezbollah is the second greatest killer of American citizens accepting Al Quaeda in the world today. It has branches in many countries (including ours) and is nearly the sole source of terror against Israel and western interests in that region.
#2 Iran's army, unlike Iraq's had been flourishing and growing in power, number and capability since the Iran v Iraq war. It is (accepting Israel) the sole power in Central Asia boasting a formidable stock of missles and other semi-advanced weaponry and a human force in the hundreds of thousands.
#3 We had known at high levels prior to the invasion of Iraq that Iran had been carrying on a clandestine Nuclear program since the late 90's, something that as we now know Iraq had neither the money, nor the capability to do as of 2003.

Now, given that information, (and I am certain I missed some things) shouldn't Iran have been our first target in the war on Terror? Iraq would have kept as noted by our military ease in running over their army in two weeks time. As of today however we find ourselves unable to act on Iran because we went into Iraq first. Now an intelligent person could surmize that the larger purpose of going into Iraq was to establish a friendly government and a military presence in close proximity to hostile countries like Iran and Syria. Whether for the purpose of leverage or pre-emption we obviously wanted to be there. What we did not count on was the world's (and our own countries) reaction to a prolonged fight in Iraq. Nor did we plan for or count on there being a prolonged fight in Iraq. Thusly, as things stand today our hands are tied with regard to Iran to a certain extent because it has become obvious that the world and some of our own citizens will not tolerate another pre-emptive war without a major crystal clear justification, short of an Iranian attack on our soil. Not to mention the fact that a pre-emptive attack would bring an almost immediate response apon the closest US target, our soldiers stationed in Iraq. So we sit mired in the bureaucracy of the United Nations, not able to do what we really should do which is to nuke Iran's programs back into the 7th century. In addition we are subject to the whims of hostile powers on the Security council in China and Russia who have deep financial interests in seeing Iran's program survive or even succeed and thus will veto any resolution that suggests strong action. Now I am no conspiracy theorist nor am I against military action or my President, but I have to wonder why in light of all these facts, Iraq was not second?

Monday, August 21, 2006

Why Israel will beat Hezbollah - IDF Hotties

I am a happily taken and satisfied man so things like this do not really interest me. But this guy definitely has a point. Hat Tip http://plancksconstant.org for the great link.

read more | digg story

Summer Poll Results

Yes, folks with the 22nd of August apon us and Maqmood's threats still hanging in the air I thought it appropriate to deliver to you the results of our latest poll here at Uncle Tim's. The question was, "Which is a greater threat to our civil liberties?" Though it was close down the stretch you all overwellminly chose "Ted Kennedy's Breath" as the greatest threat to our civil liberties

Another Candidate for the Nobel Peace Prize











Dr. Azzam Tamimi...What, never heard of him before? Well, that could be because you are not a psycho facist terrorist or a news hound like us. Either way you should know this name as he has some very interesting and disturbing things to say about these difficult days and the struggles that Muslims find themselves in currently. Dr. Tamimi for instance believes that it is just to die for one's faith. Not too radical an idea eh? I mean faith is something that many Christians have died for over the ages right? The problem is that he draws no distinction between dying for your faith and murdering innocent people in the process. He says in fact, that he was prepared to be a suicide bomber if the opportunity arose. He said that sacrificing himself for Palestine was a noble cause. "It is the straight way to pleasing my God and I would do it if I had the opportunity." The good doctor believes that murdering people in the process of commiting suicide is the "straight path" to God, and contrastly believes that evil would be to "rub shoulders with Bush and Blair" most likely in protest to negotiating with the west to find some middle ground.

The cause of terrorism reminds me of a person currently in my life, not by choice but by consequence. Her existence revolves around keeping attention on her plight, and focus of the cause on other mostly innocent parties around her. The queer thing about her is that in order for things to be "ok" some drama has to exist. If none exists, she will make some out of thin air in order to keep her world nominal and accomplish the above. Most of the time the source of the drama is some action taken in haste for immediate gain or some other such thing. Similarly, the terrorist must always have an enemy to justify its existence. Whether it be Israel, the US, Britan ,etc... there will never be any peace because in order to survive they need war and tension. Contrary to what some believe, when left alone and to their own devices they will still vilanize anyone in their path that does not agree absolutely and enable there activities. That is why "taking the fight to the terrorists", as George Bush is so fond of saying, is important. Put simply, they will not stop if we do. They will only move purposely into another stage of drama and strife and in order to justify it will find fault in even the best circumstances.

So is this guy Tamimi a radical Islamic cleric from Pakistan or Iran? Is he a militant fighting US occupation in Iraq? No this guy is your next door neighbor, this guy is your daughter's friends father. He is a british citizen with three children and a wife living in the suburbs of North West London. So take careful note of Dr. Tamimi, just one more in a line of martys and insane Muslims bent on killing you, your family and anyone else that gets in the way of his "cause". He is not alone and he and his ilke are not going away anytime soon.

Friday, August 18, 2006

Ray Davies must have been Israeli















Do it again! should be the theme song for the Israel/Palestinian conflict. Just the futility of another war ended without resolution to anyones liking and another conflict inside a conflict that leaves Israel looking worse than it did before. Still facing THIS yet again from an enemy that has nothing if not infinite patience, Before the ink is even dry on the cease fire agreement. Put simply we should have let Israel finish the job and if Iran or Syria got involved then damn the torpedos!

I have learned this life lesson from dealing with my ex-wife over the last few years and trying to placate her, to keep a reasonable peace between us for the sake of the kids (innocents). What I learned is this: You cannot deal rationally with an irrational person or entity and expect fairness or justice in return. Your attempts at being fair and agreeable will only be percieved as weakness and exploited in the end. That selfish or morally vacuous personalities will seek after their own self interests, forsaking all other points of view, valid or not even if they have to lie, cheat, etc... to get there. They are not concerned with the effect their actions will have on those directly or indirectly involved in their conflict and will always claim victory and shift blame in every circumstance. The only way to deal with this type of person or country for that matter is to stand fast and face them, not giving any ground and always fighting to win. There may be times when you are considered unpopular and it may hurt more than a little, but if I know anything at all, I know that justice will prevail in the end.

I wonder if Olmert has ever been divorced?
_____________________________________________________
Update: I found another appropriate pic at Barking Moonbats so I had to include it...

Friday Funnies

Thursday, August 17, 2006

Senator Joseph Lieberman - I Conn.
















Has a nice ring to it!

Yesterday leaders from the Democratic Party threatened to strip Lieberman of his Dem Status should he continue on his current path and defeat Ned Lamont in November. This is from an article titled "Dems angst escalates"...

“I think there’s a lot of concern,” said a senior Democratic aide who has discussed the subject with colleagues. “I think the first step is if the Lieberman thing turns into a side show and hurts our message and ability to take back the Senate, and the White House and the [National Republican Senatorial Committee] manipulate him, there are going to be a lot of unhappy people in our caucus.”

At issue in this race is Lieberman's support for the Iraq war and President Bush's war on terrorism. The Senator is strongly against a timetable for Iraq withdrawl and advocates many of the same techniques for apprehending members or terror organizations that have drawn sharp critisizm from many on the far left of the Democratic party. He does have some support from moderates who state that a win for Lieberman is still a win for Democrats. This includes also asking other senators and the DNC to spend their campaign dollars elsewhere, the article said. As of 8/16 Lieberman had a 12 point lead over Lamont and advocates on both sides of the aisle believe this is due to a groundswell of support from republicans in order to thwart what would be an agressive anti-war Senator in Lamont.

Here at Uncle Tim's we say "Lieberman in 06", and get a big kick out of this statement:

“Lieberman’s tone and message has shocked a lot of people,” said a second senior Democratic aide who has discussed the issue with other Senate Democrats. “He’s way off message for us and right in line with the White House.”

I know he has a very liberal record on other issues, butwhat's that they say about the enemy of my enemy? Go, Go Joe!!

Wednesday, August 16, 2006

Weird Website Wednesday

Ok, for this installment we have the most Obscure patents website. Check out the below and then click the link to go to the actual site.












An apparatus for simulating a "high-five" including a lower arm portion having a simulated hand removably attached thereto, an upper arm portion, an elbow joint for pivotally securing the lower arm portion to the upper arm portion, and a spring biasing element for biasing the upper and lower arm portions towards a predetermined alignment.

Obscure Patents Website