Friday Funnies

The classified document in the sock joke just never quits being funny...

Nobel Piece Prize

Well, the Nobel committee has done it again folks. Just when you thought they could not top Arafat or Carter, here comes big Al! I wonder if anyone took the time to measure the levels of methane emission before Move on.Org lit the match.

To quote the Czech Republic's President, "only Al Gore, and not a sane person, would say that mankind is ruining the planet. "














Previous Post: Company of Champions

An Unbiased Abortion Film?!?

I was happy to see that this director at least took an honest look at the horror of Abortion in its element. But I am still frustrated to find that the argument is being framed in a way that makes abortion "the" alternative choice to having a baby. Now I am a Christian, but I will not preach abstinence for all here, nor will I try to tell you what Jesus would do (even though that is clear). What I need to get across here is this. The director quotes Noam Chomsky as saying :

"There are conflicting values and taken in isolation each of these values is quite legitimate," he adds. "Choice is legitimate, preserving life is legitimate."

The plain fact is, he is correct, but the choice is not whether to abort or keep a child. The "choice" is whether to put you and your partner at risk of becoming pregnant in the first place. Excluding rape alone, this speaks loudly of our culture's inability to marry gratification with personal responsibility. For this very reason millions of Americans suffer from huge amounts of credit card debt. It is in fact too late to "choose" once you have put yourself in a position where paying your massive debt or declaring bankruptcy are the only options. No, if you are not prepared to take responsibility for the result of your actions then you have no business walking into the store to begin with. Therefore if what we are saying (and I think all would agree) is that preserving life is important as Chomsky states, or to go a bit farther as I and many others believe, to say that human life is sacred once it begins, then the debate is essentially over. Any 4th grader can tell you what usually happens when mommy and daddy do their thing... They get pregers and little johnny gets a baby sister. Really, babys don't get delivered by storks as an answer to mom's prayer (anymore). The point is that God (or nature if you prefer) created sexual relations with the purpose of procreation in mind. Why do you think it's so much fun! I can tell you that the human race would be doomed if sex were like say, plucking nose hairs, or bikini waxing or some such thing. As a society we have so totally lost our way when we can go straight to abortion as the other option while skipping over completely the fact that we should have just kept our trousers on in the first place. I am not a prude, just practical. I am totally fine with pre-emptive birth control in theory, but none of it is fool proof. So the bottom line is... If you are not prepared to face the fact that you may become pregnant, carry and deliver a baby your "choice" is simple. Do not have sex! This is not a debate about abortions or no abortions, it is a debate about responsibility or blatant irresponsibility.

Here is the article link

5th Floor: Islamofacists, Moonbats, and Other Picture Postcards

From Ace Of Spades: Hsu may have only been the tip of the far left iceberg

From Malkin: Columbia Students Organize Protest Over Machmood Imademigod visit

On Machmood's Body Odor

Friday Funnies

Gotta Love the BBC!

This is an exerpt from their children website about 9/11 listed under the heading of "Why They Did It", reffering to Al Quaeda.

" The way America has got involved in conflicts in regions like the Middle East has made some people very angry."

Read the rest here, kind of shocking, but really predictable as well.

Strange Bedfellows: The Irony Of Transecting Agendas Between Radical Islam and The American Far Left

After hearing the transcript of the new Osama video today and thinking back at some of Ahmadinejad's more recent ramblings about the west it occurred to me just what unlikely partners they have become with what are now, the mainstream of the Left wing in our American political spectrum. What also struck me was the irony of such a union. Among other things, the enemy of my enemy is my friend came to mind. But most striking was the oft heard realization around conservative circles, that the liberals in this country would be the first to die and be persecuted were the Islamists to get their much revered Caliphate state here in the US. More specifically, were the liberals in America to win every single battle they now fight for the radical islamist here and abroad, their own values, or lack thereof would be the first casualties of the Islamist new found "Civil Liberty". Everything the left holds dear is an absolute affront to Sharia law and to Islam in general. Yet we have Osama quoting Chomsky, lamenting global warming, etc... and liberals in this country attempting to grant known terrorists Miranda rights that only united states citizens enjoy, putting Muslim foot baths in on college campuses, and fighting for designated prayer time for Muslims in schools.

The real difference is though folks, that Osama, Ahmadinejad, and their ilk are playing the libs like Clapton plays a blond strat and its working, achieving their ends. The libs however think they are appealing to the broader kinder nature of the Radical Islamist by their efforts and actions and being lead to believe by the Islamists that this is in fact working. That if we just stop fighting them and give them the "rights" they deserve, everything will be peachy keen. They really believe that this will foster a peaceful globalist society, that does not war with its neighbors and does not seek to overthrow governments and push its own agenda upon the rest of the world. As I have already supposed above however, this is simply not the case. For the Islamist, this is a mere marriage of convenience and an opportunity to decieve the enemy as they are taught to do in their most Holy books.

To close I would like to quote for you one of the most hilarious couple of lines from Osama's most recent rant. He says first, "You permitted Bush to complete his first term, and stranger still, chose him for a second term," then, "after several years of tragedies of this war, the vast majority of you want it stopped. Thus, you elected the Democratic Party for this purpose, but the Democrats haven't made a move worth mentioning. On the contrary, they continue to agree to the spending of tens of billions".

Note the incredulity of these two statements, he is angry because his unwitting puppets have not done their job properly. Strange bedfellows indeed!

Ann's Corner

From Ann's Latest Article...

"Liberals have no idea what they think about homosexuality, which is why their arguments are completely contradictory. They gay-bait Republicans with abandon -- and then turn around and complain about homophobia.

They call Larry Craig a "deviant" based on accusations that he attempted to solicit sex in a public bathroom -– and then ferociously attack efforts to prevent people from having sex in public bathrooms.

They say people are born gay -- and then they say it's the celibacy requirement that turns Catholic priests gay. "

Click Here for the full column

Totally classic!!!

This Has Gone Too Far

Deported Mexican migrant mom asks Mexican president to return to US as peace ambassador

Note to lady with no right to be in our Country: Stay home, get here legally or don't come at all. Period. You are not being treated like a terrorist, you are being treated like a person who broke our laws, entered this coutry without permission and then got caught. end of story.

Other Picture Postcards

Jeff Emanuel's article details the frightening truth about Iran

The "I solicited Gay Sex in a bathroom and slept with pages, but I'm not Gay" Senator responds

Beckham - He's injured, he's not injured... Let me know when we all figure this out

Apparently, even a soccer ball can be offensive to Muslims

Christianity is fair game once again, but Radical Islam gets a fear pass

Ith's Tho Thilly - Marketing Mid-East tourist destinations to Gays

Liberals are not Christlike Part Deux

When I read this article today on CNN.com I just had to shake my head. Barak Obama on the 26th speaking at a Sunday church service in New Orleans invoked the Sermon on the mount. No not as an exhortation to believers to obey God's precepts, nor was it a call to be a doer of the Word. No, in fact of all the 20 + lessons Jesus taught on that mountain Obama managed to espouse not one of them, take an integral passage completely out of context, and miss the entire point of the sermon Jesus gave while he was at it. In fact he likened the famous passage in which Christ tells His listeners to build their houses on a Rock by being doers and not just hearers of The Word of God to our Governments lack of response during Hurricane Katrina.

Obama said:

"Getting ready to talk to you today, I recall what Jesus said at the end of the Sermon on the Mount," Obama said at New Orleans' First Emmanuel Baptist Church. "He said, whoever hears these sayings of mine and does them, I will liken him to a wise man who built his house on a rock."

"The rains descended, the floods came, and the winds blew and beat on that house. But it did not fall, because it was founded on the rock," he continued.

That rock, he said, was a principal of brotherhood exemplified by the church during Hurricane Katrina — but not the federal government.

"Something was wrong in America. Our foundation wasn't built on the rock."

Now, if that isn't the biggest bit of pandering to Christians I have heard since Hillary adopted her "Southern" accent, I don't know what is. First of all, if Barak were any sort of Christian at all he would know that "The Rock" is not/was not anything even remotely related to any principal of brotherhood. the Rock is Christ Himself and The Word of God. Secondly however I do agree that something was and is wrong in America, and that our foundation is less and less these days firmly planted on The Rock, the True Living Stone "that causes men to stumble". Unfortunately, Mr Obama and his paper "Faith" with comments like this are part of the problem. It is appalling to me that someone could fear God so little as to misrepresent the very words of Christ for political gain and to further their own agenda. This Liberal hand extended to Christian voters is a joke. Again as I said in the last post, I just hope America will see through it. For now I'll just have faith that nothing is hidden from God and that the truth will be laid bare in the coming months as to where these democratic candidates really stand on issues of Faith.

Here is a link to the actual sermon broken down into teachings. Sermon On The Mount

Ann's Corner

In the latest offering from columnist Ann Coulter, she address the Baghdad Diarist...

"Various conservatives began questioning the plausibility of the anonymous diarist's account — noting, for example, that Bradley vehicles don't "swerve," as the diarist claimed. The editor of The New Republic responded by attacking the skeptics' motives, complaining that some conservatives make "a living denying any bad news that emanates from Iraq." But when that clever retort failed to quiet rumblings from the right wing, The New Republic finally revealed the "Baghdad Diarist" to be ... John Kerry! Actually it was Pvt. Scott Thomas Beauchamp, Democratic candidate for president circa 2028. (That gives him 20 years to learn to pronounce "Genghis.")"


Too classic. View the whole article here

News Busters has an article here as well

Well, Bless My Soul.. Could It Really Be??

The AP is actually going to admit there is progress being made in IRAQ since the surge?? I don't know about you, but between the Favorable New York Times Editorial page last week and the above article, I am starting to wonder which way really is up. I mean the next thing you know, Barack Obama will want to invade Pakistan... Umm... or A Democratic controlled congress will pass some new very ambiguous wire tapping legislation that doesn't require FISA approval. Crazy Huh? But those things'll never happen...

Wink, Wink, Nudge, Nudge!

Friday Funnies

Why Liberals will never win back the religous voter

There is now and has been ever since the losses of 2004 a massive effort underway by democrats to ferret out the reasons why people of faith voted and still continue to vote Republican in very large numbers. In an article out today from Time/CNN this fact becomes totally apparent from lines like these,

"Clinton has hired Burns Strider, a congressional staffer (and evangelical Baptist from Mississippi) who is assembling a faith steering group from major denominations and sends out a weekly wrap-up, Faith, Family and Values. Edwards has been organizing conference calls with progressive religious leaders and is about to embark on a 12-city poverty tour. In the past month alone, Obama's campaign has run six faith forums in New Hampshire, where local clergy and laypeople discuss religious engagement in politics. "We talk about ways people of faith have gone wrong in the past, what they have done right and where they see it going in the future," says his faith-outreach adviser, Joshua DuBois."

Full Article at time.com


So, I think it is safe to say they are serious. But with that said, it all begs the question, why did the dems lose the faith vote in the first place? Well, speaking as a person of faith and as someone who knows many devout people of faith, we vote against them not because they do not appear religious, but because they have no Christian walk to speak of, values voters vote on the basis of #1. what have you done, #2. what are you saying you'll do and #3. have you been true to what scripture says about a particular issue? No "faith steering groups", "faith-outreach-advisor's", or "faith forums" are going to replace a simple statement of your faith as it relates to the important issues like abortion, gay marriage, poverty, immigration and education that face our nation evidenced in ...wait for it... your voting record. Yes folks, it does matter to us backward religious idiots what you actually voted for in Congress or when you were Governor, Mayor, etc... It does not matter to us how religious you appear, nor does it matter how many ordained liberal hypocrites you can get to say you are a God fearing person. It also looks especially lame and desperate to me personally that they are trying so hard, and spending so much money to win something that frankly does not take money to win, but Truth, Values and an adherence to God's sovereign word.

Review: Harry Potter and The Order Of The Phoenix

I went and watched on the opening night, because, yes, I am a Potter addict. But before you ask, NO I do not find a conflict between my Christian faith and my love of the Potter series. But that is neither here nor there for the purposes of this post. I am here today to write a review. Honestly I was impressed for the most part with this adaptation and applaud the endeavor in the first place. However, from this movie comes the problem with using a different director for each new film. You never know what you are going to get. This time unfortunately we got less than we bargained for in a variety of areas.

#1 Realizing it would have had to be a 4 hour movie to include everything, this director excluded far too many important parts that were in the book. If you had not read any of the books and were following the movies by them selves this movie would have done nothing but confuse you.

#2 THEY CHANGED THE BLOODY STORY! Honestly guys , leave what you have to on the cutting floor, but you CAN'T change the actual story. To name just a few things, they were not at all true to the book regarding Harry's failed relationship with Cho, nor with the cause of the DA's eventual discovery. The plot point with the Centaurs was not at all there or aloud to develop nor was the reason for Harry's initial coldness toward Ron and Hermione which would have I am sure seemed extremely odd on screen to someone who had not read the book prior. Most noticeable though was the complete transformation of the end scenes from the book in the Ministry/Dept. Of Mysteries. They absolutely ripped it apart and ruined what was one of the most entertaining and gripping pieces of literature yet written by Rowling. From their entrance to the death of Sirius, to the battle climax between Voldemort and Dumbledore, in a series of scene that seemed to last around 10 minutes there were maybe 60 seconds of actual book in there. Very, very, disappointing. Don't let them push you around next time J.K., it was right the way it was written.

As for character casting I wanted to mention that I appreciated very much the way Dolores Umbridge was portrayed by Imelda Staunton. Though she should have been a tad more toady looking in the end she did a wonderful job. Also big nods to Evanna Lynch as Lunna Lovegood who though introduced entirely improperly and who's character was not given any chance to properly develop as in the book, did a superb job. Though I do seem to remember Luna wearing some sort of x-ray specs or something throughout much of the story. Nods also to Natalia Tena as Tonks and Helena Carter as Bellatrix. Nice work on Grawp and the Thestrals, Grawp looked like Alfred E. Neuman which was kind of distracting, but the effect was still good. Not so much on the Centaurs and the Sirius face in the fire effect. Both have been done much better in prior movies and should have stayed that way. Also, my misgivings about story changing aside it was very cool to see the grown up wizards fight one another. That was the bread and butter of the whole final sequence and it just ended way to fast.

All in all as I originally said, an entertaining film, but this director/screenwriter, etc... let the story down to a certain extent and did not do it complete justice by any means.

An All Gay Debate?!?%*##

Well that's just plain gay(lame), not to be confused with gay(homosexual) or gay(extremely happy).

Come to think of it that is rather confusing... Does this mean that the dems will hold a debate that not only caters to homosexuals, but also lame idiots and extremely happy people alike? I wonder if Hillary will go the extra mile like she did down south? Maybe slick back the doo and dress up in spikes while refering to all her staffers as "My B*tch" and instructing Bill to speak with a lisp. Edwards won't have to do really anything, cept' maybe schedule a hair and nail appointment one week prior.

The Only Reason To Watch Live Earth

Nuff Said!!

Happy 4th Of July!!

Happy Birthday America!! This is one of my favorite holidays here at UT's so I put together some pictures and links

What Is Independence Day??

Famous Facts:

Patriotism

Revolutionary War

Founding Fathers

Myth and Truth about Independence Day

Faith's role in our Independence

Hey! You got Great Satan Chocolate in my Liberal Peanut Butter

...No! You got Liberal Peanut Butter in my Great Satan Chocolate. Good thing at least one of these two dummies doesn't see what a classic combination they'd make!

From news24.com

Iran rejects Stone film request

This is the most classic line in the article but you should really read the whole thing.

"We have already seen his documentaries - even though Stone is considered a member of the opposition group in the US, it is still part of the Great Satan"




After this and hearing that Rosie O'Donnell got turned down for the Price Is Right job, I am starting to think that old prince of darkness is slippin' a bit.